AI Opportunity Assessment · Deliverable
Where AI can create the greatest impact in your business — and how to move forward with confidence.
Confidential — prepared exclusively for Brookhaven Insurance Group. Not for distribution.
This is an illustrative sample prepared by Guilix Solutions to show the structure and depth of a real AI Opportunity Blueprint. Brookhaven Insurance Group is a fictional company; all findings, figures, and recommendations shown here are representative examples, not actual client data or results.
Executive Summary
Brookhaven Insurance Group has built a trusted, multi-office agency over more than two decades, but growth has outpaced the manual processes behind it. Application intake, carrier submissions, and renewal reviews all still run on staff hours that scale linearly with policy count.
Our assessment found that Brookhaven's biggest constraint isn't producer headcount or market access — it's the number of account manager hours consumed by re-entering the same client data by hand: transcribing an application into the agency management system, then re-keying it again into four or five carrier portals, then rebuilding a comparison spreadsheet from scratch. These are precisely the tasks AI is best suited to absorb.
We recommend starting with two low-effort, high-impact changes — AI-assisted application intake and self-serve certificate of insurance issuance — both deployable within the first eight weeks. Together they free the service team's time to work the renewal book proactively, which is where the real retention risk sits.
What’s inside this Blueprint
01 — Business & Workflow Analysis
“A clear view of how key processes operate today, including where time, effort, and resources are being lost.”
Agency Snapshot
What Leadership Wants
How this was assessed: three weeks on site and remote, including structured interviews with the agency principal, commercial and personal lines managers, and department leads; half-day shadowing sessions with the new-business intake and renewal review teams; and a review of the agency management system, comparative rating tools, and carrier portals in use today.
01 — Business & Workflow Analysis (continued)
We walked the path a single new commercial submission takes from first inquiry to bound policy, timing each step and noting who owns it. Four of the six steps depend entirely on manual effort.
Figure 1. Current-state quote-to-bind workflow for new commercial accounts, Brookhaven Insurance Group.
Handling time alone understates the real cost: contested submissions often sit in an account manager's queue between steps 3 and 4 while carrier quotes trickle in over several days, stretching the effective cycle well past this 127-minute baseline. The next section names each bottleneck individually and sizes its impact.
02 — Bottleneck Identification
“Identify repetitive work, manual processes, delays, and friction points that are limiting efficiency or growth.”
Account managers manually transcribe client-provided ACORD applications, prior declarations pages, and loss runs into the agency management system, with no automated check for missing information until underwriting flags it.
The service team fields roughly 60 certificate requests a week by phone and email, each requiring a manual pull of policy data from the agency management system and manual issuance.
For a typical commercial account, account managers manually re-enter the same underwriting data into four to six different carrier rating portals, since no two carriers accept a shared submission format.
Most renewals get a real coverage review only in the final two weeks before the expiration date, leaving little room to shop the market, close coverage gaps, or pursue cross-sell.
When an insured calls about a claim, CSRs log into carrier claims portals individually to check status and call the client back, rather than the client hearing about a status change proactively.
03 — AI Opportunity Map
“A structured view of where AI could create meaningful value across your operations.”
New Business Intake
Extracts client data from ACORD forms, loss runs, and email attachments directly into the agency management system, so account managers review instead of retype.
Client Service
Lets clients request and receive routine certificates instantly, without a phone call or manual policy lookup.
Commercial Lines Marketing
Fills carrier rating portals from one shared submission record instead of re-keying the same data four to six times.
Renewals & Retention
Flags exposure changes, coverage gaps, and cross-sell opportunities 90 days out, not two weeks out.
Claims Support
Checks carrier claims portals automatically and notifies clients of status changes before they have to call and ask.
Personal Lines
Longer-term candidate to speed up auto and home rating once the commercial-lines workflow is proven out.
04 — Prioritized Recommendations
“Opportunities ranked by potential impact, practicality, complexity, and business value so you know what to address first.”
Figure 1. Business impact plotted against implementation effort for all six recommendations.
| Opportunity | Function | Impact | Effort | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AI-assisted application intake | New Business Intake | High | Low |
| 2 | Self-serve certificate of insurance issuance | Client Service | High | Low |
| 3 | Multi-carrier submission assistant | Commercial Lines Marketing | High | Medium |
| 4 | Proactive renewal review assistant | Renewals & Retention | High | Medium |
| 5 | Claims status assistant | Claims Support | Medium | Medium |
| 6 | AI-assisted personal lines quoting | Personal Lines | Medium | High |
05 — Solution & Technology Guidance
“Recommendations for the types of AI capabilities, tools, and integrations best suited to each priority.”
We favor solutions that work with the systems Brookhaven already runs — its agency management system and carrier portals — rather than introducing new platforms staff have to learn from scratch. Every recommendation below is scoped as an addition to the existing stack, not a replacement of it.
| Opportunity | AI Capability | Integration Approach | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AI-assisted application intake | Document & form parsing + structured data extraction | Reads inbound applications, loss runs, and prior declarations pages, pre-filling entries directly in the existing agency management system — no AMS replacement required. |
| 2 | Self-serve certificate of insurance issuance | Rules-based document generation, client-facing | Pulls current policy data from the AMS and issues standard certificates instantly through a client portal, with exceptions routed to a person. |
| 3 | Multi-carrier submission assistant | Structured data mapping + automated form-fill across portals | Uses one shared submission record to populate each carrier's rating portal, instead of a new comparative-rating platform. |
| 4 | Proactive renewal review assistant | Predictive risk & coverage-gap analysis | Flags exposure changes and coverage gaps 90 days ahead of expiration, surfaced inside the AMS renewal workflow account managers already use. |
| 5 | Claims status assistant | Carrier portal monitoring + automated client notification | Checks carrier claims systems on a schedule and notifies the client and CSR of status changes — no new claims system introduced. |
| 6 | AI-assisted personal lines quoting | Automated rating & comparison | Evaluated in Phase 3, once baseline data and process from the commercial lines workflow are proven out. |
06 — Implementation Roadmap
“A practical, phased path for turning the highest-priority opportunities into working solutions.”
Figure 3. Twelve-month implementation timeline across all six recommendations.
We sequence work so each phase is funded by the results of the one before it: Phase 1's quick wins prove the approach with minimal disruption, Phase 2 rolls the same pattern out to the systems that touch the most premium volume, and Phase 3 extends what's working to the rest of the agency. The next page details what each phase delivers, who owns it, and what has to be true before we move to the next one.
06 — Implementation Roadmap (continued)
Every phase ends with a clear exit bar — we don't move to the next one on a calendar date alone.
Projected Impact
These figures are estimates based on current volumes and staffing, intended to size the opportunity — not a guarantee of results.
| Metric | Today | Year one target | |
|---|---|---|---|
| New-business application intake time | 30 min | → | 10–12 min |
| Carrier submission time (per account) | 45 min | → | 15 min |
| Certificate of insurance turnaround | Hours (phone / email) | → | Under 5 min |
| Renewal review lead time | 12 days | → | 90+ days |
| Claims-status call volume | 1 in 5 inbound calls | → | Under 1 in 10 |
Figures are illustrative estimates for this sample scenario, not measured results from an actual engagement.
Continue with Guilix
Every engagement starts with an AI Opportunity Assessment built around your business — not a generic package. The free AI Strategy Call is where we figure out if that's the right next step.